Now, this is the standard for when a rule change is needed, I believe. So, let's use it. The argument against the belly putter is that you can anchor it to your body and it makes the pendulum stroke easier. That sounds like it is unfair. But, is it really? I mean, you don't putt with your belly, or your hands. You putt with your head and shoulders! Can you still push it? Of course! Pull it? Of course! Is it less likely? Well, let's look at the stats. I went to the PGA Tour strokes gained stat in putting and let's see how the belly putters rank.
Keegan Bradley ranks 44th
Ernie Els ranks 71st
Robert Garrigus ranks 152nd
Carl Pettersson ranks 11th
Adam Scott no ranking
Webb Simpson ranks 29th
Bill Haas ranks 98th
As you can see, the belly putters are not blowing away the competition. In fact, they are quite normal. In my opinion, I do not think they give you any advantage. In my opinion, the large mallet putters are a FAR bigger advantage than the belly putters. The mallets add weight to the bottom of the stroke which creates a strong pendulum effect, whereas the belly putter creates a longer pendulum which helps, but not as much as the extra weight on the bottom.
Clearly, there is no real advantage. I say stop crying about it! In putting you can do whatever you want. That's the beauty of it. Has putting become automatic for these guys? No! So, let them do it. Putting is hard and has evolved greatly since the beginning of golf and will continue to do so.
I think the belly putter should stay.
May all of your putts hit dead center,
Hogie (which is a nickname that has really died)
P.S. Bear, if you are an Italian, the sun doesn't burn you, it warms you to your very soul.
P.S.S. What are Bear's thoughts on the belly putter debate?